Senin, 22 Desember 2008

THE FOCAL INFECTION THEORY


Although there exists a great deal of controversy regarding the success of endodontic therapy, the scientific facts at the present time are that only about 10% of root canal treated teeth experience some type of failure. The controversy over endodontic treatment is not new. Beginning in about 1912, there was wide acceptance of the theory of “focal infection” which resulted in the wholesale extraction of both vital and pulp less teeth. It wasn’t until well after World War II, with the availability of improved x-rays, anesthetics, new methods and products, and the publication of the first major text book devoted to “Root Canal Therapy” that the “focal infection” theory lost favor and “saving” rather than extracting the tooth became the “standard of care.” Now however, the 1990’s has seen a resurrection of the focal infection theory.

Lets look briefly at the “Focal Infection” theory. The main purpose of the dental pulp is to supply nutrients to the dentin as long as the tooth is alive. This is done through microscopic tubules in the dentin. To give you some indication of what is meant by microscopic, each tooth contains approximately 1.5 million tubules. As the living cells necroses (rot) within the central pulp chamber of an infected tooth, this same phenomenon is happening within the tubules. In theory, root canal therapy attempts to completely obliterate and fill the main pulp chamber and canals. However, it is impossible to fill the millions of microscopic tubules. Once inside the tooth, bacteria can remain within the tubules, growing and multiplying. Because microbes can change their form and function in response to changed microenvironment within the tubules, they can go on living in spite of the altered oxygen and food supply. As they do so, they begin to produce various toxic chemicals, which have been shown to be harmful, sometimes being especially toxic to specific organs or organ systems. This phenomenon was confirmed in a recent 1987 study by Tronstad and Associates demonstrating that anaerobic bacteria 9bacteria not requiring oxygen to survive) were able to survive and maintain an infectious disease in periapical lesions of non-vital teeth. In a 1991 follow up study of endodontically treated teeth, these authors recovered microorganisms from periapical lesion of all examined teeth.

The immediate question this raises is: If there are bacteria present from every endodontically treated tooth, why doesn’t every root canal treated tooth become abscessed and fail? An oversimplification of the answer is that your own body’s immune system is able to contain and neutralize the bacteria.
Dr. Weston Price, during the early 1990’s, devoted most of his brilliant career to investigation of the focal infection theory. his research, involving thousands of patients and rabbits, formed the basis for the over 220 articles and 3 major books which he authored. In essence, the focus infection theory research by Dr. Price holds that it is not the bacterial that causes systemic problems, but rather the toxic chemicals produced from the necrosis and decay within the tubules, whether the tooth had been endodontically treated or not. As a consequence of the fact that there was no way to completely seal the apex (tip of the root) and the tubules, the need to extract both vital and pulp less teeth, when an infection was evident, became the effective treatment.

There are now a group of dentist around the country who are openly advocating the extraction of every root canalled tooth on the basis of the research done by Dr. Price. This is certainly a radical approach to solving a problem that appears to be limited to only about 10% of the total number of root canal treatments done. Furthermore, it certainly does not take into consideration the use of calcium oxide as a root canal medication in the treatment of infected root canals. much of the current confusion in the minds of the public about the efficacy of root canal therapy has been precipitated by the book “root Canal Cover Up” written by George Meinig, D.D.S., past president of the American Association of Endodontists. Dr. Meinig extensively cites the work of Dr. Price and concludes that there is a serious problem with root canal therapy and teeth that have had root canal treatment. This, of course, is a major break with his own previous training and the policies of both the American Association of Endodontists, and the American Dental Association. Patients going to an “establishment” endodontist or dentist who does not subscribe to the focal infection theory are given a much different picture on the efficacy of root canal treatment rely heavily in the use of some very toxic chemicals and cements. And although there is a 90% success rate for most endodontic procedures, it is still a scientific fact that using the existing endodonitic materials and techniques, there is no way to totally deal the apex of the tooth and the dentinal tubules.

www.worldwidehealthcenter

Beberapa Mitos tentang Pengaruh Gigi dengan Perawatan Saluran Akar (PSA) terhadap kesehatan umum

Apakah Anda seorang dokter gigi? Jika benar, maka sebaiknya Anda membaca tentang ini. What do you think about this article?

The aim of Root Canal Therapy is to ’save’ a tooth which has become infected or dead, in an attempt to make it functional and pain free.

There are many presumptions about Root Canal Therapy which are based in myth rather than science. The philosophy underlying the teaching of dentistry limits it’s practice to mechanics, pain control and aesthetics. The systemic effects of dental treatment are rarely considered.

Dr. Weston Price was the leading dental researcher at the turn of the century. He was the head of the American Dental Association and wrote numerous papers on subjects as diverse as the role of nutrition on dental health to the effects of dead teeth and root canal therapy on systemic health. Dr. Price researched the effects of Root Canal Therapy for over twenty years. He was able to correlate different disease states with the types of pathology seen around dead teeth. He demonstrated thousands of times, the creation of diseases from non-vital teeth. He demonstrated how every belief about Root Canal Therapy, held by the dental community at the time, was based on a complete lack of scientific research. They were myths which developed and were then believed. These beliefs have now become set in concrete as truths by the current dental communities.

If you think that the research is out of date, you should realise that the techniques, most of the materials, and some of the instruments that were used then are identical to those used today. The medicaments used to ’sterilize’ teeth then, are still being used today - Camphor, Phenol, Formaldehyde, Menthol.
Recently published research, completely supports that done by Dr Price. Specially that of Dr. Patrick Störtebeker, Assoc. Professor of Neural Surgery at Karolinska University in Sweden [2,3 4,5] , and the work of Dr. Eugene Ratner [6,7] in the United States.


Some of the myths that are still perpetuated include:

1. You can see infection on an x-ray
FALSE! Only if the angle is correct you may see some bone loss on an x-ray. It is impossible to demonstrate infection with an x-ray as dental radiographs only ’see’ hard tissue. They do not see soft tissue or infections. Due to the shadow cast by the root it may also be impossible to see the bone loss.

2. You can gauge the extent of infection by the amount of bone loss on an x-ray.
FALSE! It is assumed in dentistry that the extent of bone loss is a direct indication of the amount of infection present. This is a false assumption because the bone loss may take time to develop. The extent of the bone loss about the end of the root is also a function of the body’s immune system being able to isolate the infection process. It has little to do with the degree of infection.[8]

Sometimes there is no bone loss, but instead, a condensation of bone about the end of a dead tooth. We are taught in dentistry that this indicates a lack of infection. The reality is that teeth showing a ‘Condensing Osteitis’ are demonstrating that the body’s immune system is incapable of quarantining the infection locally.19 These are often the teeth which cause the greatest systemic effects. This is put neatly by Dr Josef Issels 1995 (translated direct from German):

“If the local resistance is already so weakened that the inflammatory focus no longer can become encapsulated, the inflammatory toxins will infiltrate without hindrance into the pulpa and the whole organism.

If an inflammatory process can no longer be localised and encapsulated, it proves, as emphasised by Pischinger and Kellner that the organism has become largely non reactive. On an X-ray, these teeth normally show no translucence. This is characterised as X-ray negative .

In our cancer patients, such non-encapsulated focus, and therefore X-ray negative teeth, do frequently exist. This indicates the enormity of low resistance of these patients.” [9]

3. You can determine the length of a tooth by x-ray.
FALSE! Dentistry teaches that a root canal must be filled to within 1mm of the root apex. The apex of a root canal is only rarely determinable by X-ray. Thus most root canals are worked too short, or so long that the root filling will protrude through the end of the tooth and into the bone. This is born out by research published in the dental literature:

“Thirty two canals in four mongrel dogs were treated endodontically. The mandibular third and fourth premolars were selected for study because their apices were widely spaced and could be studied individually without danger of confusion”

“Examination of the histologic sections revealed that in some cases root canal instrumentation had been terminated slightly short of the anatomic apex. Moreover some canals which appeared reontgenographically to be filled slightly short of the apex actually were associated with extrusion of some particles of sealer into the periodontal ligament space”
Five canals were accidentally overfilled. Of the 32 tested, 4 were overfilled. Therefore 5 out of 28 canals which were radiographically under-filled were in fact overfilled. This is a failure rate of 17% in terms of basic endodontic procedure.

“In the canals which were overfilled, the extruded materials were always associated with advanced destruction of the surrounding tissue and liquification necrosis” [10]

It is not possible with an x-ray to see:

* the end of the root canal,
* the angle of the root canal,
* the number of canals or
* the various branches of each canal

4. It is possible to actually treat all of the hollow areas of the tooth. This is assumed to be limited to the actual root canals.

False! It is assumed that the only part of the tooth which contains soft tissue is the actual root canal. Even in the latest Australian Dental Association handout on root therapy they state “All root canals in the effected tooth must be treated”[11]. Unfortunately the root canals are the smallest area of the tooth which contains nerves, blood vessels and connective tissue.

The root canals are really like the tap root of a tree - one main root with hundreds of branches coming off it and opening to the edge of the root all the way along its length. It is impossible to treat these accessory canals.
As well, the dentine is not a solid structure. It is made of tubules which extend from the surface of the root canal to the enamel of the crown and to the cementum on the root surface. Each tubule is estimated to be able to contain 8 bacteria across its diameter. In a front tooth which has only one root there is over three kilometers of tubing. This equates to billions of microorganisms in just one tooth.

In comparison to the volume contained in the accessory canals and the dentine tubules, that of the root canal is actually quite small. It is not possible to remove dead infected soft tissue from whole of the tooth. When only the root canals are treated there remains a massive amount of gangrenous tissue which is infected by anaerobic microorganisms.

Dr Issels puts it this way; (note that this is a translation from German and directly quoted) [9]

“Altmann, Doepke and Pritz, as well as Fischer, Hess and other researchers have become involved with the fine structure of the tooth. They have found that the hard substance of the tooth in no way resembles an avital structure but maintains an active metabolic process with pulpa and dental periosteum. The pulper cavity and the external surface of the root are connected with each other via very fine canals. They are again connected via the mesenchymal fissures and capillars of the central periosteum with the canal system of the jaw bone and its pulper spaces and therefore with the general organism. This knowledge has refuted the concept, which had existed for decades, that the tooth, after removal and sealing off the pulper cavity, would be an isolated, avital structure no longer maintaining further exchange transactions. Even the most perfect preservation will only reach the most vertical intermediary trunk of the root canal system. In no way will it reach the lateral branches or the numerous dental canalculi, which likewise takes its exit from the root canal. Even after the most precise preparation of the root canal, there will always remain protein in the adjoining areas. This protein is usually infected and denaturated by filling materials, whereby toxic decomposition products will be formed. It was demonstrated by MEYER (Goettingen), that the dental canaliculi exhibits an exuberant bacterial flora. The decomposition toxins produced by these microbes can, with a dental root filling, no longer empty into the oral cavity. They can only be derived via the cross connection and the unsealed branches of the root canal finally reaching the pulper spaces of the jaw and thereby the flowing systems of the organism. Because of the devitalising and preservation procedures, the tooth has become a “toxin factory” by which the organism will be continually damaged.”

It is claimed by most dental authorities that the bodies immune system will take care of what is left over. This is an assumption based in fantasy. If the blood supply of the tooth has been removed (which is what happens when the root canal is ‘cleaned out’) the cells of the immune system cannot get there.

Often during or before root therapy is started the dentist will administer antibiotics. This may lead to a rapid reduction in pain. Unfortunately both the dentist and the patient assume that the infection has been eradicated. The reason that the pain disappears is only because there is a reduction in pressure from around the end of the root. The antibiotics do not effect the organisms which reside within the tooth which are the original and continuing source of microorganisms and their toxins. As there is no blood supply to the tooth it is impossible to get the antibiotics in there either. [12]

” In the case of an acutely infected tooth there is no natural process of drainage and there is no mechanism by which the antibiotics which have been administered can reach the bacteria inside the tooth” [1]

5. It is possible to sterilize the canal by using medicaments placed inside the canal.

FALSE! It is impossible to sterilize the canals. The medicaments and antibiotics used do not penetrate the dentine tubules. Dr. Price was even able to culture bacteria from teeth through which he had poured fuming formaldehyde. Even the recent dental literature reflects this:

“It is now known that complete sterilization of an infected root canal is very difficult to achieve and complete removal of all pulp tissue remnants frequently is not possible.” [13]

6. Bacteria that penetrate the canals and tubules are usually the ‘aerobic’ type found in the mouth. When the canal is sealed and the oxygen supply cut of, these bacteria die.

FALSE! The bacteria, yeasts and other organisms which enter the tooth do not die when the oxygen supply is reduced (as happens inside the root canal system). They undergo what is called a pleomorphic change[14,15] and become ‘anaerobic’ bacteria. They literally change form and become bacteria that do not need oxygen to live. It is now known that dead teeth are usually heavily infected with gram negative anaerobic bacteria.[16] Sundqvist, in 1976 isolated 88 species of bacteria out of 32 root canals with periapical disease.[17] “Only 5 of those bacteria could grow in air. Strict anaerobic bacteria must have played a decisive pathological role although a limited number of facultative species have been show to induce periapical lesions………………..”

Long standing populations of infected root canals do contain a mixture of strict anaerobes. Low grade but chronic periapical inflammation is the result that may last for years.”

Other organisms such as yeasts, funguses and ‘cell-wall-deficient forms’ (Lida Mattman) also inhabit this tissue[18]. The dead teeth thus become a focus of infection which can cause numerous disease states throughout the body. Anaerobic bacteria produce incredibly potent neurologic and hemolytic toxins. A true “Toxin Factory”.

7. If it does not hurt it must be OK!

FALSE! Weston Price’s comments are most succinct;
“Local comfort……… may constitute both what is probably one of the greatest paradoxes and one of the costliest diagnostic mistakes through injury to health, that exists in dental and medical practice ………… the absence of this local reaction and the consequent destruction by the infection products, permits them to pass through the body to irritate and break down that patient’s most susceptible tissue”.

Lack of pain around the tooth is usually taken to mean a successful root therapy. Unfortunately it does not rule out the possibility of systemic effects.

8. Systemic effects need not be thought of in relation to dental disease.

FALSE! All researchers from Weston Price[19] , Billings, Rosenow, Stortebecker, Ratner and many others, have demonstrated the spread of systemic disease from infected teeth and gums. It is only the dental profession, who are not trained in medicine, that refuse to accept this basic concept. The research of Steinman[20] in the 70’s conclusively demonstrates the relationship of metabolic dysfunction and dental disease.

Patrick Stortebecker and others have demonstrated the transport of all materials, microorganisms and their toxins directly from the tooth back to the brain via the blood and by transport along the nerve fibres.[2,3,4,5] Many other research articles have shown that whatever you put in a tooth can be transported to the rest of the body. [21,22 23,24]

As Schondorf states “A root canal treatment which does not plant a focus, does not exist”

References:
1-Focal Infection - The endodontic point of view Ehrmann Oral Surgery Vol 44 No 4 October 1977
2-Stortebecker P “Dental Infectious Foci and diseases of the nervous system - spread of microorganisms and their products from dental infectious foci along direct cranial venous pathways eliciting a toxic - infectious encephalopathy” Acta. Psych Neural Scand 36 Suppl. 157 (1961) 62
3-Stortebecker P “The cranial venous system filled from pulp of a tooth - Proceedings” 3rd Int. Congress of Nero Surg. Copenhagen Aug 1965
4-Stortebecker P “Dental significance of pathways for dissemination from infectious foci.” J Can Dent Assoc 33:6 1967 pp301-311
5-Stortebecker P “Chronic dental infections in the etiology of Glioblastomas. 8th int congress” Neuropathy. Washington D.C. Sept 1978 J Neuropth. Exp. Neurology 37(s) 1978
6-Shklar , Person, Ratner. Oral pathology and Trigeminal Neuralgia III J Dent Res. 1976;55(B):299
7-Ratner E., Langer., Evins M., alveolar Cavitational Osteopathosis manifestations of an infectious process and its implications in the causation of chronic pain. J Periodoontal 1986;57:593-603
8-M.K Sharief N Eng J Med 1991 325:467-72
9-More Cures for Cancer Translation form the German by Dr Josef Issels Helfer Publishing E. -Schwabe, Bad Homburg FRG.
10-Malcolm Davis . Periapical and intracanal healing following incomplete root canal fillings in dogs. Oral Surgery May 1971 Vol 31 No 5.
11-Australian Dental Association handout December 1996
12-Philip Delivanis Oral Surgery 1981 Vol 52 No 4
13-Phillip Delivanis Oral Surgery 1981 Vol 52 No 4
14-The persecution and trial of Gaston Naessens. By Christopher Bird Pub. HJ Kramer Inc Tiburon CA ISBN 109876543 (1991)
15-The Cancer Cure that worked. The Rife Report. Life of Dr Royal Rife. By Barry Lynes , Marcus books 1994
16-K.E Safvi J. Endo. vol 17 No 1 Jan 1991
17-Wu, Moorer, Wesselink. Capacity of anaerobic bacteria enclosed in a simulated root canal to induce inflammation. Int. Endodontic Journal (1989) 22, 269-277
18-Personal research with Dr J Burke of Australian Biologics, Sydney
19-Weston Price. Dental Infections Oral and Systemic. Vol 1 & 2
20-R.Steinman J Southern California State Dental Assoc. Vol 28, No11 November 1960
21-Capra N. Andersopn KV. Pride JB. Jones TE simultaneous “Demonstration of Neuronal Somata that innovate the tooth pulp and adjacent periodontal tissues using two retrogradely transported anatomic markers.” Exp. Neurol 86(1984) 165-170
22-Marfurt C. Turner D Uptake and transneuronal transport of Horseradish Peroxidase - Wheat Germ aglutinin by Tooth Pulp Primary Afferent Neurons’ Brain Res. 452(1988) 381-387
23-Marfurt C. Turner D ‘The central Projections of tooth pulp afferent neurons in the rat as determined by the Transganglionic transport of Horseradish Peroxidase” J. of Comp.Neuro 223 (1984) 535-547.
24-Arvidson J. Gobel S. “An HRP study of the Central Projections of Primary Trigeminal Neurons which innovate tooth pulps in the cat. ” Brain Res. 210 (1981) 1-16.

www.rumahkusorgaku.wordpress.com

www.worldwidehealthcenter

Rabu, 26 November 2008

Pregnant and Born / Hamil dan Lahir

Seperti hampir semua anak kecil di dunia, daku pernah bertanya-tanya, dari manakah datangnya seorang anak? Dan daku pernah mempunyai konsep yang amat sangat indah. Menurut pikiran daku yang waktu itu belum mengenal istilah pembuahan ataupun proses-proses kenikmatan yang mendahuluinya, anak dihasilkan dari pengharapan.
Like almost every child in this world, I was also questioning (wondering) where the babies come from. And I have a beautiful theory — from my innocent thought, which for sure at that time still don't know what the fertilization process is, or the pleasure activity preceding before it — a child comes from hope.
Saat sepasang suami-istri menikah, maka diberkatilah mereka. Mereka akan saling mengasihi dan berdoa bersama akan datangnya seorang anak. Oleh karena itu, tidak jarang kita akan mendengar perkataan, "Mereka masih menunggu datangnya seorang anak dalam kehidupan mereka." Bah, kenapa pakai kata-kata seperti itu? Kesannya terlalu saru. Sampai-sampai muncullah pemikiran bahwa seorang anak tiba-tiba 'diselipkan' begitu saja ke rahim seorang istri. Belakangan aku baru tahu kalau seorang anak itu bukan ditunggu kedatangannya, tapi 'diusahakan'.
When a man and a woman are blessed to become husband and wife, they shall love each other, and then pray together for a coming of a child. Because of that, we are often hear a lot of people say that the couple's hope of getting a child hasn't been granted yet — or they are still hoping (waiting) for a child to enter their life. Walae, why do we use those expression? It seems so ambiguous and made me think that a child can just be slipped into a woman's womb. Finally, I knew that a a child is not for us to wait but it is for us to work out... :)
Yah mungkin juga aku bisa berpikir seperti itu karena dulu belum tahu ada kasus yang istilahhnya 'hamil di luar nikah', 'kecelakaan' ataupun unwanted child. (Lah kalau memang anak didatangkan dengan doa, tentunya atas persetujuan Tuhan dong. Dengan kata lain yang bisa hamil itu cuma istri-istri dari pasangan yang diberkati di tempat ibadah secara agama dan direstui oleh seluruh sanak keluarga). Waktu itu juga sepertinya gelar MBA (Married By Accident) belum begitu populer.
Perhaps it was caused by my naive thinking, I didn't recognize a case of woman got pregnant out of wedlock, "accident" or even "unwanted child." If a child comes from a granted pray so it must comes from GOD's approval. Thus, all wives that are expecting baby is only the blessed ones from all churches, temples, mosque, etc. and must also blessed by the entire family — as at the time, when I was a kid — no such things as MBA (Married By Accident) or that phrase was not (too) popular.
Tapi aku pernah mendengar sebuah berita di televisi yang mengubah konsep 'anak datang dari doa'. Kalau tidak salah ingat, berita tersebut tentang seorang guru yang amat sangat genit dan sangat 'dekat dan akrab' dengan muridnya. (dekat dalam arti, Sangat... dekat sekali dalam makna denotasi)
My concept — a child comes form hope — suddenly changed when I was watching a local news on the TV. If I remembered correctly, it was about a flirty high school teacher, famous to be close to his student — close in the meaning 'too close' in a denotation meaning.
Nah kira-kira laporan yang dibacakan oleh narator (atau apalah namanya yang baca berita pas dikasih gambar) itu berbunyi, "Tersangka terkenal suka memegang-megang siswi. Ada yang pipinya dielus, bahkan ada yang hamil." Sudah bisa ditebak ada yang ada di pikiran daku waktu itu?
The news anchor (the person who read the story when you can see the illustration picture) was telling that the teacher loves to touch the girls. He loves to touch the cheek of the girls and even one of them gets pregnant... Can you guess how wild my imagination is when I heard that news?
"Oh... ternyata mengelus pipi bisa berefek samping hamil!!!" Pikiran daku tidak berhenti di sana, lalu aku mengambil satu kesimpulan teori: "Sentuhan seorang lelaki bisa meresap ke dalam kulit dan akhirnya tiba di perut? Membesar, membesar, dan akhirnya menjadi seorang bayi?" Bahaya bener... Pantesan orang-orang tua selalu bilang, "Ati-ati, jangan tidur sama lelaki!!" Wah, berarti pas tidur seranjang, sebelah-sebelahan, tiba-tiba tengah malam nanti ada 'sesuatu' yang tiba-tiba merayap keluar dari si jantan dan menyusup ke perut betina? Dan DUING!!! Mengembanglah perut sang betina. Tapi, belakangan (saat daku kira-kira udah SMA) tante daku malah bilang, "Tidur sama cowok itu gak papa. Asal bener tidur bareng ya. Kalau gak tidur, nah, itulah yang bahaya!" Hm... ada benarnya juga sih.
"Oh... so you can get pregnant if a man touch your cheek!!!" And my imagination didn't stop at that point. I concluded that a touch of a man can really go through into your skin and then turn up on your tummy. After that, it's getting bigger and bigger, and finally became a baby!! Wow... it's so dangerous... no wonder parents always says to their daughter, "Be careful, don't sleep with a man!!!" Wa... does it mean that if a man and a woman sleep side by side, then something will crawl slowly in the midnight from a man and will slip to a woman's tummy? And then, DUNG!!! The woman's tummy blows up. But, when I was in senior high school, my auntie said, "It's OK to sleep side by side with a man as long as you REALLY sleep!!! If you don't sleep... thus... IT IS DANGEROUS!!!". Hmm, it's quite true.
Oh iya, ngomong-ngomong. Kalau dilihat di komik ataupun di film kartun, ada yang menceritakan bahwa bayi itu didatangkan oleh burung besar! (entah jenis apa dan dari mana) Wah... kalau dipikir-pikir, aneh juga ya cerita ini, kira-kira masih ada anak kecil yang percaya gak ya? Soalnya menurut fakta, banyak hewan termasuk burung tentunya, terancam punah karena ekspansi wilayah yang dilakukan manusia ke habitat mereka di alam. Lalu di mana letak logikanya kalau pembawa kelahiran itu sendiri terancam punah sementara manusia malah semakin banyak? Yah, mungkin memang seharusnya cerita film kartun tidak boleh dianggap serius.
By the way, comics or cartoons are often tell us that a big bird (a type of crane?) will bring the babies... This story, according to me, is quite funny... do you think that many children still believe that? It's funny for me since, as you know, that a lot of animal, including birds are already in the rare category... almost gone because of human's expansion to their environment in the nature. So, where is the logical thinking, if the carrier itself are almost gone but human are getting more and more? Yeah, maybe that's way we may not consider cartoon movies so seriously.
Mari kita ke tahap selanjutnya, hal lahir melahirkan. Hm.. kayanya daku mengerti istilah 'caesar' terlebih dahulu daripada lahir alami. Kenapa bisa begitu? Gampang saja alasannya.
Let's move on to the next level... I think I understood Caesar operation as a delivery method earlier than the natural one... How could it be so? It was a very simple reason...
Setelah bayi tumbuh besar di dalam perut, ia perlu segera dikeluarkan sebelom perut ibunya meledak. Nah cara paling cepat adalah membuka perut ibu, mengeluarkan bayi, lalu kita tutup kembali. Hampir persis sama seperti cara kerja resleting. Bagaimana prosesnya secara lebih mendetail? Ah peduli amat sama tetek bengek proses 'caesar' itu. Toh dokter pasti punya obat bius kan? Tinggal suntik sana suntik sini, siaplah perut ibu dibelek tanpa rasa sakit.
My thinking was... after a baby grows in mum's tummy, he/she should be out of it before his/her mum's tummy explodes, so the easiest way is to open mum's tummy and then, close it up again. It almost looks like if we close up our zipper... How are the details of the process? Shall we care? No need, right? There are doctors to give the mummies a sleeping shots... shoot here... shoot there and mummy's tummy is ready to be opened without any pain.
Pada waktu masih SD, seorang teman menceritakan teorinya yang lebih ajaib lagi. Katanya, sebenarnya saat ibu hamil, isi perutnya adalah cairan. Lalu bagaimana cara melahirkan? Dengan penuh keyakinan dia berkata, "Melalui cara yang sama kaya kencing." "Heh? Kenapa bisa begitu? Kalau yang keluar cuma cairan, bayinya mana? Apa harus dibekukan sampai pada suhu 0°C? Pake cetakan kue?" "Denger dulu dong. Setelah semua cairan dikeluarkan, kempeslah perut si mama. Tugas dokter adalah memastikan agar cairan tersebut tertampung seluruhnya dengan baik. Jangan sampai ada yang tumpah! Nanti bisa-bisa bayinya cacat. Setelah ditampung, biarkan beberapa lama, lalu dengan sendirinya air kencing itu akan berubah menjadi seorang bayi!!!"
Another theory is come from my primary school's friend... and it is more imaginary than mine. He said that the pregnant mummy contains of a kind of liquid. If so, then how to deliver the baby? With full confidence, he said, "Using the same way like we go to urinate." "Huh? How come it is like that? If it's only liquid, so where is the baby? Do we have to freeze it in 0ºC and use a cake molder to shape the baby?" "Hey!!! Please hear it first!!! After all the liquid is out, of course mummy's tummy is smaller... then the doctor is supposed to make sure that he get all the liquid and there is no even one drop goes wasted, so the baby will be a healthy and complete baby. After that, the doctor shall keep the liquid for awhile... and then... abracadabra... By itself, the liquid turns to a baby!!!"
Heh? Kok gaya penjelasannya bahkan kaya di resep-resep masakan? (setelah matang, biarkan beberapa lama, lalu makanan siap dihidangkan). Mungkin juga teman daku itu berpikir kalau setelah cairan itu ditampung, lalu dimasukkan ke dalam inkubator. Jadi guna inkubator seperti guna oven pada pembuatan roti. Masukkan cairan, lalu cairan tersebut akan mengembang, sebagian menjadi daging, tulang, sebagian besar masih berupa cairan, yaitu darah. Mungkin teman daku itu terinspirasi untuk membandingkan antara inkubator ( yang bentuknya kotak) yang di rumah sakit dan oven (kotak juga!) yang ada di dapur.
The way she told me the theory sounded like told me about food recipes — after it's cooked, leave it for a while, then it's ready to be eaten... It might cross my friend's mind that after the doctor collects all the liquid, he will put it in an incubator. So the function of incubator is the same as the function of an oven when you make a bread. Put the liquid, let it blows up, a part of it will become flesh, bones, and the rest is still a liquid, i.e. blood. Maybe he was inspired by the form of an incubator in the hospital, which is square and the form of an oven (that's also square) in his mummy's kitchen.
http://www.kejut.com/lahir

Rabu, 19 November 2008

Asthma

Asthma is a chronic disease involving the respiratory system in which the airways occasionally constrict, become inflamed, and are lined with excessive amounts of mucus, often in response to one or more triggers.[1] These episodes may be triggered by such things as exposure to an environmental stimulant such as an allergen, environmental tobacco smoke, cold or warm air, perfume, pet dander, moist air, exercise or exertion, or emotional stress. In children, the most common triggers are viral illnesses such as those that cause the common cold.[2] This airway narrowing causes symptoms such as wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and coughing. The airway constriction responds to bronchodilators. Between episodes, most patients feel well but can have mild symptoms and they may remain short of breath after exercise for longer periods of time than the unaffected individual. The symptoms of asthma, which can range from mild to life threatening, can usually be controlled with a combination of drugs and environmental changes.

Public attention in the developed world has recently focused on asthma because of its rapidly increasing prevalence, affecting up to one in four urban children.[3]
Signs and symptoms

In some individuals asthma is characterized by chronic respiratory impairment. In others it is an intermittent illness marked by episodic symptoms that may result from a number of triggering events, including upper respiratory infection, stress, airborne allergens, air pollutants (such as smoke or traffic fumes), or exercise. Some or all of the following symptoms may be present in those with asthma: dyspnea, wheezing, stridor, coughing, a tightness and itching of the chest or an inability for physical exertion. Some asthmatics who have severe shortness of breath and tightening of the lungs never wheeze or have stridor and their symptoms may be confused with a COPD-type disease.

An acute exacerbation of asthma is commonly referred to as an asthma attack. The clinical hallmarks of an attack are shortness of breath (dyspnea) and either wheezing or stridor.[4] Although the former is "often regarded as the sine qua non of asthma",[4] some patients present primarily with coughing, and in the late stages of an attack, air motion may be so impaired that no wheezing may be heard. When present the cough may sometimes produce clear sputum. The onset may be sudden, with a sense of constriction in the chest, breathing becomes difficult, and wheezing occurs (primarily upon expiration, but can be in both respiratory phases).

Signs of an asthmatic episode include wheezing, prolonged expiration, a rapid heart rate (tachycardia), rhonchous lung sounds (audible through a stethoscope), the presence of a paradoxical pulse (a pulse that is weaker during inhalation and stronger during exhalation), and over-inflation of the chest. During a serious asthma attack, the accessory muscles of respiration (sternocleidomastoid and scalene muscles of the neck) may be used, shown as in-drawing of tissues between the ribs and above the sternum and clavicles.

During very severe attacks, an asthma sufferer can turn blue from lack of oxygen, and can experience chest pain or even loss of consciousness. Just before loss of consciousness, there is a chance that the patient will feel numbness in the limbs and palms may start to sweat. The person's feet may become icy cold. Severe asthma attacks, which may not be responsive to standard treatments (status asthmaticus), are life-threatening and may lead to respiratory arrest and death. Despite the severity of symptoms during an asthmatic episode, between attacks an asthmatic may show few or even no signs of the disease.[5]

[edit] Cause

Asthma is caused by a complex interaction of environmental and genetic factors that researchers do not yet fully understand.[6] These factors can also influence how severe a person’s asthma is and how well they respond to medication.[7] As with other complex diseases, many environmental and genetic factors have been suggested as causes of asthma, but not all of them have been replicated. In addition, as researchers detangle the complex causes of asthma, it is becoming more evident that certain environmental and genetic factors may affect asthma only when combined.

[edit] Environmental

Many environmental risk factors have been associated with asthma development and morbidity in children, but a few stand out as well-replicated or that have a meta-analysis of several studies to support their direct association.

Environmental tobacco smoke, especially maternal cigarette smoking, is associated with high risk of asthma prevalence and asthma morbidity, wheeze, and respiratory infections.[8] Poor air quality, from traffic pollution or high ozone levels, has been repeatedly associated with increased asthma morbidity and has a suggested association with asthma development that needs further research.[8][9]

Caesarean sections have been associated with asthma when compared with vaginal birth; a meta-analysis found a 20% increase in asthma prevalence in children delivered by Cesarean section compared to those who were not. It was proposed that this is due to modified bacterial exposure during Cesarean section compared with vaginal birth, which modifies the immune system (as described by the hygiene hypothesis).[10]

Psychological stress, on the part of a child's caregiver, has been associated with asthma and is an area of active research. Stress can modify behaviors that affect asthma, like smoking, but research suggests that stress has other effects as well. There is growing evidence that stress may influence asthma and other diseases by influencing the immune system.[8]

Viral respiratory infections at an early age, along with siblings and day care exposure, may be protective against asthma, although there have been controversial results, and this protection may depend on genetic context.[8][11][12] Antibiotic use early in life has been linked to development of asthma in several examples; it is thought that antibiotics make one susceptible to development of asthma because they modify gut flora, and thus the immune system (as described by the hygiene hypothesis).[13]

The hygiene hypothesis is an hypothesis about the cause of asthma and other allergic disease, and is supported by epidemiologic data for asthma. For example, asthma prevalence has been increasing in developed countries along with increased use of antibiotics, c-sections, and cleaning products.[13][10][14] All of these things may negatively affect exposure to beneficial bacteria and other immune system modulators that are important during development, and thus may cause increased risk for asthma and allergy.

[edit] Genetic

Over 100 genes have been associated with asthma in at least one genetic association study.[15] However, such studies must be repeated to ensure the findings are not due to chance. Through the end of 2005, 25 genes had been associated with asthma in six or more separate populations:[15]

* GSTM1
* IL10
* CTLA-4
* SPINK5
* LTC4S



* LTA
* GRPA
* NOD1
* CC16
* GSTP1



* STAT6
* NOS1
* CCL5
* TBXA2R
* TGFB1



* IL4
* IL13
* CD14
* ADRB2 (β-2 adrenergic receptor)
* HLA-DRB1



* HLA-DQB1
* TNF
* FCER1B
* IL4R
* ADAM33

Many of these genes are related to the immune system or to modulating inflammation. However, even among this list of highly replicated genes associated with asthma, the results have not been consistent among all of the populations that have been tested.[15] This indicates that these genes are not associated with asthma under every condition, and that researchers need to do further investigation to figure out the complex interactions that cause asthma. One theory is that asthma is a collection of several diseases, and that genes might have a role in only subsets of asthma. For example, one group of genetic differences (single nucleotide polymorphisms in 17q21) was associated with asthma that develops in childhood.[16]

[edit] Gene-environment Interactions

Research suggests that some genetic variants may only cause asthma when they are combined with specific environmental exposures, and otherwise may not be risk factors for asthma.[6]

The genetic trait, CD14 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) C-159T and exposure to endotoxin (a bacterial product) are a well-replicated example of a gene-environment interaction that is associated with asthma. Endotoxin exposure varies from person to person and can come from several environmental sources, including environmental tobacco smoke, dogs, and farms. Researchers have found that risk for asthma changes based on a person’s genotype at CD14 C-159T and level of endotoxin exposure.[17]
CD14-endotoxin interaction based on CD14 SNP C-159T[17] Endotoxin levels CC genotype TT genotype
High exposure Low risk High risk
Low exposure High risk Low risk

[edit] Pathophysiology

In asthma, constriction of the airways occurs due to bronchoconstriction and bronchial inflammation. Bronchoconstriction is the narrowing of the airways in the lungs due to the tightening of surrounding smooth muscle. Bronchial inflammation also causes narrowing due to edema and swelling caused by an immune response to allergens.

[edit] Bronchoconstriction
Inflamed airways and bronchoconstriction in asthma. Airways narrowed as a result of the inflammatory response cause wheezing.

During an asthma episode, inflamed airways react to environmental triggers such as smoke, dust, or pollen. The airways narrow and produce excess mucus, making it difficult to breathe. In essence, asthma is the result of an immune response in the bronchial airways.[18]

The airways of asthmatics are "hypersensitive" to certain triggers, also known as stimuli (see below). (It is usually classified as type I hypersensitivity.)[19][20] In response to exposure to these triggers, the bronchi (large airways) contract into spasm (an "asthma attack"). Inflammation soon follows, leading to a further narrowing of the airways and excessive mucus production, which leads to coughing and other breathing difficulties.

The normal caliber of the bronchus is maintained by a balanced functioning of these systems, which both operate reflexively. The parasympathetic reflex loop consists of afferent nerve endings which originate under the inner lining of the bronchus. Whenever these afferent nerve endings are stimulated (for example, by dust, cold air or fumes) impulses travel to the brain-stem vagal center, then down the vagal afferent pathway to again reach the bronchus. Acetylcholine is released from the afferent nerve endings. This acetylcholine results in the excessive formation of cyclic Guanine Mono phosphate (cGMP). This initiates bronchoconstriction.

[edit] Bronchial inflammation

The mechanisms behind allergic asthma—i.e., asthma resulting from an immune response to inhaled allergens—are the best understood of the causal factors. In both asthmatics and non-asthmatics, inhaled allergens that find their way to the inner airways are ingested by a type of cell known as antigen-presenting cells, or APCs. APCs then "present" pieces of the allergen to other immune system cells. In most people, these other immune cells (TH0 cells) "check" and usually ignore the allergen molecules. In asthmatics, however, these cells transform into a different type of cell (TH2), for reasons that are not well understood. The resultant TH2 cells activate an important arm of the immune system, known as the humoral immune system. The humoral immune system produces antibodies against the inhaled allergen. Later, when an asthmatic inhales the same allergen, these antibodies "recognize" it and activate a humoral response. Inflammation results: chemicals are produced that cause the airways to constrict and release more mucus, and the cell-mediated arm of the immune system is activated. The inflammatory response is responsible for the clinical manifestations of an asthma attack.

[edit] Stimuli

* Allergens from nature, typically inhaled, which include waste from common household pests, such as the house dust mite and cockroach, grass pollen, mold spores, and pet epithelial cells;[citation needed]
* Indoor air pollution from volatile organic compounds, including perfumes and perfumed products. Examples include soap, dishwashing liquid, laundry detergent, fabric softener, paper tissues, paper towels, toilet paper, shampoo, hairspray, hair gel, cosmetics, facial cream, sun cream, deodorant, cologne, shaving cream, aftershave lotion, air freshener and candles, and products such as oil-based paint.[citation needed]
* Medications, including aspirin,[21] β-adrenergic antagonists (beta blockers), and penicillin.[citation needed]
* Food allergies such as milk, peanuts, and eggs. However, asthma is rarely the only symptom, and not all people with food or other allergies have asthma.[citation needed]
* Use of fossil fuel related allergenic air pollution, such as ozone, smog, summer smog, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide, which is thought to be one of the major reasons for the high prevalence of asthma in urban areas.[citation needed]
* Various industrial compounds and other chemicals, notably sulfites; chlorinated swimming pools generate chloramines—monochloramine (NH2Cl), dichloramine (NHCl2) and trichloramine (NCl3)—in the air around them, which are known to induce asthma.[22]
* Early childhood infections, especially viral upper respiratory tract infections. However, persons of any age can have asthma triggered by colds and other respiratory infections even though their normal stimuli might be from another category (e.g. pollen) and absent at the time of infection. In many cases, significant asthma may not even occur until the respiratory infection is in its waning stage, and the person is seemingly improving. Eighty percent of asthma attacks in adults and 60% in children are caused by respiratory viruses.[citation needed]
* Exercise or intense use of respiratory system. The effects of which differ somewhat from those of the other triggers, since they are brief.
* Hormonal changes in adolescent girls and adult women associated with their menstrual cycle can lead to a worsening of asthma. Some women also experience a worsening of their asthma during pregnancy whereas others find no significant changes, and in other women their asthma improves during their pregnancy.[citation needed]
* Emotional stress which is poorly understood as a trigger. Emotional stress can affect breathing temporarily, however unlike something such as heart problems, it is unclear if it has any long-term effect.[citation needed]
* Cold weather can make it harder for asthmatics to breathe.[23] Whether high altitude helps or worsens asthma is debatable and may vary from person to person.[24]

[edit] Pathogenesis

The fundamental problem in asthma appears to be immunological: young children in the early stages of asthma show signs of excessive inflammation in their airways. Epidemiological findings give clues as to the pathogenesis: the incidence of asthma seems to be increasing worldwide, and asthma is now very much more common in affluent countries.

In 1968 Andor Szentivanyi first described The Beta Adrenergic Theory of Asthma; in which blockage of the Beta-2 receptors of pulmonary smooth muscle cells causes asthma.[25] Szentivanyi's Beta Adrenergic Theory is a citation classic[26] and has been cited more times than any other article in the history of the Journal of Allergy.

In 1995 Szentivanyi and colleagues demonstrated that IgE blocks beta-2 receptors.[27] Since overproduction of IgE is central to all atopic diseases, this was a watershed moment in the world of allergy.[28]

The Beta-Adrenergic Theory has been cited in the scholarship of such noted investigators as Richard F. Lockey (former President of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology),[29] Charles Reed (Chief of Allergy at Mayo Medical School),[30] and Craig Venter (Human Genome Project).[31]

John P. McGovern, President of the American Association of Allergy nominated Szentivanyi for The 1968 Nobel Prize in Medicine in recognition of The Beta Adrenergic Theory.

In 2006, Researchers at Harvard Medical School found evidence that asthma is caused by over-proliferation of a special type of natural "killer" cell.[32]

[edit] Asthma and sleep apnea

It is recognized with increasing frequency, that patients who have both obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and bronchial asthma, often improve tremendously when the sleep apnea is diagnosed and treated.[33] CPAP is not effective in patients with nocturnal asthma only.[34]

[edit] Asthma and gastro-esophageal reflux disease

If gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is present, the patient may have repetitive episodes of acid aspiration. GERD may be common in difficult-to-control asthma, but according to one study, treating it does not seem to affect the asthma.[35]

[edit] Diagnosis

Asthma is defined simply as reversible airway obstruction. Reversibility occurs either spontaneously or with treatment. The basic measurement is peak flow rates and the following diagnostic criteria are used by the British Thoracic Society:[36]

* ≥20% difference on at least three days in a week for at least two weeks;
* ≥20% improvement of peak flow following treatment, for example:
o 10 minutes of inhaled β-agonist (e.g., salbutamol);
o six week of inhaled corticosteroid (e.g., beclometasone);
o 14 days of 30mg prednisolone.
* ≥20% decrease in peak flow following exposure to a trigger (e.g., exercise).

In many cases, a physician can diagnose asthma on the basis of typical findings in a patient's clinical history and examination. Asthma is strongly suspected if a patient suffers from eczema or other allergic conditions—suggesting a general atopic constitution—or has a family history of asthma. While measurement of airway function is possible for adults, most new cases are diagnosed in children who are unable to perform such tests. Diagnosis in children is based on a careful compilation and analysis of the patient's medical history and subsequent improvement with an inhaled bronchodilator medication. In adults, diagnosis can be made with a peak flow meter (which tests airway restriction), looking at both the diurnal variation and any reversibility following inhaled bronchodilator medication.

Testing peak flow at rest (or baseline) and after exercise can be helpful, especially in young asthmatics who may experience only exercise-induced asthma. If the diagnosis is in doubt, a more formal lung function test may be conducted. Once a diagnosis of asthma is made, a patient can use peak flow meter testing to monitor the severity of the disease.

Monitoring asthma with a peak flow meter on an ongoing basis assists with self monitoring of asthma. Peak flow readings can be charted on graph paper charts together with a record of symptoms or use peak flow charting software.[37] This allows patients to track their peak flow readings and pass information back to their doctor or nurse.[38]

In the Emergency Department doctors may use a capnography which measures the amount of exhaled carbon dioxide,[39] along with pulse oximetry which shows the amount of oxygen dissolved in the blood, to determine the severity of an asthma attack as well as the response to treatment.

More recently, exhaled nitric oxide has been studied as a breath test indicative of airway inflammation in asthma.

[edit] Differential diagnosis
This article does not cite any references or sources.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. (November 2008)

Before diagnosing someone as asthmatic, alternative possibilities should be considered. A clinician taking a history should check whether the patient is using any known bronchoconstrictors (substances that cause narrowing of the airways, e.g., certain anti-inflammatory agents or beta-blockers).

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which closely resembles asthma, is correlated with more exposure to cigarette smoke, an older patient, less symptom reversibility after bronchodilator administration (as measured by spirometry), and decreased likelihood of family history of atopy.

Pulmonary aspiration, whether direct due to dysphagia (swallowing disorder) or indirect (due to acid reflux), can show similar symptoms to asthma. However, with aspiration, fevers might also indicate aspiration pneumonia. Direct aspiration (dysphagia) can be diagnosed by performing a Modified Barium Swallow test and treated with feeding therapy by a qualified speech therapist. If the aspiration is indirect (from acid reflux) then treatment directed at this is indicated.

A majority of children who are asthma sufferers have an identifiable allergy trigger. Specifically, in a 2004 study, 71% had positive test results for more than 1 allergen, and 42% had positive test results for more than 3 allergens.[40]

The majority of these triggers can often be identified from the history; for instance, asthmatics with hay fever or pollen allergy will have seasonal symptoms, those with allergies to pets may experience an abatement of symptoms when away from home, and those with occupational asthma may improve during leave from work. Allergy tests can help identify avoidable symptom triggers.

After a pulmonary function test has been carried out, radiological tests, such as a chest X-ray or CT scan, may be required to exclude the possibility of other lung diseases. In some people, asthma may be triggered by gastroesophageal reflux disease, which can be treated with suitable antacids. Very occasionally, specialized tests after inhalation of methacholine — or, even less commonly, histamine — may be performed.

Asthma is categorized by the United States National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute as falling into one of four categories: intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent and severe persistent. The diagnosis of "severe persistent asthma" occurs when symptoms are continual with frequent exacerbations and frequent night-time symptoms, result in limited physical activity and when lung function as measured by PEV or FEV1 tests is less than 60% predicted with PEF variability greater than 30%.

[edit] Prevention
This article does not cite any references or sources.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. (November 2008)

Current treatment protocols recommend prevention medications such as an inhaled corticosteroid, which helps to suppress inflammation and reduces the swelling of the lining of the airways, in anyone who has frequent (greater than twice a week) need of relievers or who has severe symptoms. If symptoms persist, additional preventive drugs are added until the asthma is controlled. With the proper use of prevention drugs, asthmatics can avoid the complications that result from overuse of relief medications.

Asthmatics sometimes stop taking their preventive medication when they feel fine and have no problems breathing. This often results in further attacks, and no long-term improvement.

Preventive agents include the following.

* Inhaled glucocorticoids are the most widely used prevention medications and normally come as inhaler devices (ciclesonide, beclomethasone, budesonide, flunisolide, fluticasone, mometasone, and triamcinolone).
Long-term use of corticosteroids can have many side effects including a redistribution of fat, increased appetite, blood glucose problems and weight gain. In particular high doses of steroids may cause osteoporosis. For this reasons inhaled steroids are generally used for prevention, as their smaller doses are targeted to the lungs, unlike the higher doses of oral preparations. Nevertheless, patients on high doses of inhaled steroids may still require prophylactic treatment to prevent osteoporosis.
Deposition of steroids in the mouth may cause a hoarse voice or oral thrush (due to decreased immunity). This may be minimised by rinsing the mouth with water after inhaler use, as well as by using a spacer which increases the amount of drug that reaches the lungs.
* Leukotriene modifiers (montelukast, zafirlukast, pranlukast, and zileuton) provide anti-inflammatory effect similar to inhaled corticosteroids.
* Mast cell stabilizers (cromoglicate (cromolyn), and nedocromil).
* Antimuscarinics/anticholinergics (ipratropium, oxitropium, and tiotropium), which have a mixed reliever and preventer effect. These are often used to reduce bronchospasm when inhaled steroids do not produce sufficient relief.
* Methylxanthines (theophylline and aminophylline), which are sometimes considered if sufficient control cannot be achieved with inhaled glucocorticoids (or leukotriene modifiers) and long-acting β-agonists alone.
* Antihistamines, often used to treat allergic effects that may underlie the chronic inflammation.
* Hyposensitization, (also known as immunodesensitisation therapy) may be recommended in some cases where allergy is the suspected cause or trigger of asthma. Depending on the allergen, it can be given orally or by injection.
* Omalizumab, an IgE blocker; this can help patients with severe allergic asthma that does not respond to other drugs. However, it is expensive and must be injected.
* Methotrexate is occasionally used in some difficult-to-treat patients.
* If chronic acid indigestion (GERD) contributes to a patient's asthma, it should also be treated, because it may prolong the respiratory problem.

[edit] Trigger avoidance

As is common with respiratory disease, smoking is believed to adversely affect asthmatics in several ways, including an increased severity of symptoms, a more rapid decline of lung function, and decreased response to preventive medications.[41] Automobile emissions are considered an even more significant cause and aggravating factor.[42] Asthmatics who smoke or who live near traffic [1] typically require additional medications to help control their disease. Furthermore, exposure of both non-smokers and smokers to wood smoke, gas stove fumes and second-hand smoke is detrimental, resulting in more severe asthma, more emergency room visits, and more asthma-related hospital admissions.[43] Smoking cessation and avoidance of second-hand smoke is strongly encouraged in asthmatics.[44]

For those in whom exercise can trigger an asthma attack (exercise-induced asthma), higher levels of ventilation and cold, dry air tend to exacerbate attacks. For this reason, activities in which a patient breathes large amounts of cold air, such as skiing and running, tend to be worse for asthmatics, whereas swimming in an indoor, heated pool, with warm, humid air, or a shower is less likely to provoke a response.[4]

[edit] Air Filters

If an asthmatic lives with a smoker, use of air filter or room air cleaner is likely to be helpful. Secondhand smoke can worsen the symptoms. The same is true for those with hay fever (allergic rhino sinusitis) or COPD (emphysema or chronic bronchitis). Room air cleaners remove small particles that are in the air near the air cleaner. However, room air cleaners do not remove small allergen particles that are caused by local disturbances, such as the microscopic house dust mite feces that surround a pillow when your head hits it or you turn over in bed. There are several types of air filters available.[45]

* Mechanical air filters use a fan to force air through a special screen that traps particles such as smoke, pollens, and other airborne allergens. The high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter is the best-known air filter. HEPA (which is a type of filter, not a brand name) was developed during World War II to prevent radioactive particles from escaping from laboratories.
* Electronic air filters use electrical charges to attract and deposit allergens and irritants. If the device contains collecting plates, the particles are captured within the system; otherwise, they stick to room surfaces and have to be cleared away.
* Hybrid air filters contain elements of both mechanical and electrostatic filters.
* Gas phase air filters use activated carbon granules to remove odors (volatile organic compounds or VOCs) and non-particulate pollution such as cooking gas, gases emitted from paint or building materials (such as formaldehyde), and perfume.
* Germicidal air cleaners use ultraviolet (UV) lights to kill bacteria, viruses, and molds that pass through the area with the UV light. Such UV lights can be included with other air cleaner devices, which use a fan.
* Ozone generators are devices that intentionally produce high concentrations of ozone to clean the air in a room. They are often used to decontaminate rooms after smoke exposure following a fire.

[edit] Treatment
This article does not cite any references or sources.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. (November 2008)

The most effective treatment for asthma is identifying triggers, such as pets or aspirin, and limiting or eliminating exposure to them. If trigger avoidance is insufficient, medical treatment is available. Desensitization is currently the only known "cure" to the disease.[46] Other forms of treatment include relief medication, prevention medication, long-acting β2-agonists, and emergency treatment.

[edit] Medical

The specific medical treatment recommended to patients with asthma depends on the severity of their illness and the frequency of their symptoms. Specific treatments for asthma are broadly classified as relievers, preventers and emergency treatment. The Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma (EPR-2)[44] of the U.S. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, and the British Guideline on the Management of Asthma[47] are broadly used and supported by many doctors. On August 29, 2007 the final Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma was officially released. Bronchodilators are recommended for short-term relief in all patients. For those who experience occasional attacks, no other medication is needed. For those with mild persistent disease (more than two attacks a week), low-dose inhaled glucocorticoids or alternatively, an oral leukotriene modifier, a mast-cell stabilizer, or theophylline may be administered. For those who suffer daily attacks, a higher dose of glucocorticoid in conjunction with a long-acting inhaled β-2 agonist may be prescribed; alternatively, a leukotriene modifier or theophylline may substitute for the β-2 agonist. In severe asthmatics, oral glucocorticoids may be added to these treatments during severe attacks.

[edit] Pharmaceutical

Symptomatic control of episodes of wheezing and shortness of breath is generally achieved with fast-acting bronchodilators. These are typically provided in pocket-sized, metered-dose inhalers (MDIs). In young sufferers, who may have difficulty with the coordination necessary to use inhalers, or those with a poor ability to hold their breath for 10 seconds after inhaler use (generally the elderly), an asthma spacer (see top image) is used. The spacer is a plastic cylinder that mixes the medication with air in a simple tube, making it easier for patients to receive a full dose of the drug and allows for the active agent to be dispersed into smaller, more fully inhaled bits.

A nebulizer which provides a larger, continuous dose can also be used. Nebulizers work by vaporizing a dose of medication in a saline solution into a steady stream of foggy vapour, which the patient inhales continuously until the full dosage is administered. There is no clear evidence, however, that they are more effective than inhalers used with a spacer. Nebulizers may be helpful to some patients experiencing a severe attack. Such patients may not be able to inhale deeply, so regular inhalers may not deliver medication deeply into the lungs, even on repeated attempts. Since a nebulizer delivers the medication continuously, it is thought that the first few inhalations may relax the airways enough to allow the following inhalations to draw in more medication.

Relievers include:

* Short-acting, selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, such as salbutamol (albuterol USAN), levalbuterol, terbutaline and bitolterol.
Tremors, the major side effect, have been greatly reduced by inhaled delivery, which allows the drug to target the lungs specifically; oral and injected medications are delivered throughout the body. There may also be cardiac side effects at higher doses (due to Beta-1 agonist activity), such as elevated heart rate or blood pressure. Patients must be cautioned against using these medicines too frequently, as with such use their efficacy may decline, producing desensitization resulting in an exacerbation of symptoms which may lead to refractory asthma and death.
* Older, less selective adrenergic agonists, such as inhaled epinephrine and ephedrine tablets, have also been used. Cardiac side effects occur with these agents at either similar or lesser rates to albuterol.[48] [49] When used solely as a relief medication, inhaled epinephrine has been shown to be an effective agent to terminate an acute asthmatic exacerbation.[48] In emergencies, these drugs were sometimes administered by injection. Their use via injection has declined due to related adverse effects.
* Anticholinergic medications, such as ipratropium bromide may be used instead. They have no cardiac side effects and thus can be used in patients with heart disease; however, they take up to an hour to achieve their full effect and are not as powerful as the β2-adrenoreceptor agonists.
* Inhaled glucocorticoids are usually considered preventive medications while oral glucocorticoids are often used to supplement treatment of a severe attack. A randomized controlled trial has demonstrated the benefit of 250 microg beclomethasone when taken as an as-needed combination inhaler with 100 microg of albuterol.[50]

[edit] Long-acting β2-agonists
A typical inhaler, of Serevent (salmeterol), a long-acting bronchodilator.

Long-acting bronchodilators (LABD) are similar in structure to short-acting selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, but have much longer side chains resulting in a 12-hour effect, and are used to give a smoothed symptomatic relief (used morning and night). While patients report improved symptom control, these drugs do not replace the need for routine preventers, and their slow onset means the short-acting dilators may still be required. In November 2005, the American FDA released a health advisory alerting the public to findings that show the use of long-acting β2-agonists could lead to a worsening of symptoms, and in some cases death.[51]

Currently available long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists include salmeterol, formoterol, bambuterol, and sustained-release oral albuterol. Combinations of inhaled steroids and long-acting bronchodilators are becoming more widespread; the most common combination currently in use is fluticasone/salmeterol (Advair in the United States, and Seretide in the United Kingdom). Another combination is budesonide/formoterol which is commercially known as Symbicort.

A recent meta-analysis of the roles of long-acting beta-agonists may indicate a danger to asthma patients. The study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine in 2006, found that long-acting beta-agonists increased the risk for asthma hospitalizations and asthma deaths 2- to 4-fold, compared with placebo.[52] "These agents can improve symptoms through bronchodilation at the same time as increasing underlying inflammation and bronchial hyper-responsiveness, thus worsening asthma control without any warning of increased symptoms," said Shelley Salpeter in a press release after the publication of the study. The release goes on to say that "Three common asthma inhalers containing the drugs salmeterol or formoterol may be causing four out of five US asthma-related deaths per year and should be taken off the market".[53] This assertion is viewed by many asthma specialists as being inaccurate. Dr. Hal Nelson, in a recent letter to the Annals of Internal Medicine, points out the following:

"Salpeter and colleagues also assert that salmeterol may be responsible for 4000 of the 5000 asthma-related deaths that occur in the United States annually. However, when salmeterol was introduced in 1994, more than 5000 asthma-related deaths occurred per year. Since the peak of asthma deaths in 1996, salmeterol sales have increased about 5-fold, while overall asthma mortality rates have decreased by about 25%, despite a continued increase in asthma diagnoses. In fact, according to the most recent data from the National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. asthma mortality rates peaked in 1996 (with 5667 deaths) and have decreased steadily since. The last available data, from 2004, indicate that 3780 deaths occurred. Thus, the suggestion that a vast majority of asthma deaths could be attributable to LABA use is inconsistent with the facts."

Dr. Shelley Salpeter, in a letter to the Annals of Internal Medicine, responds to the comments of Dr. Nelson, as follows:

"It is true that the asthma death rate increased after salmeterol was introduced, then peaked and is now starting to decline despite continued use of the long-acting beta-agonists. This trend in death rates can best be explained by examining the ratio of beta-agonist use to inhaled corticosteroids... In the recent past, inhaled corticosteroid use has increased steadily while long-acting beta-agonist use has begun to stabilize and short-acting beta-agonist use has declined... Using this estimate, we can imagine that if long-acting beta-agonists were withdrawn from the market while maintaining high inhaled corticosteroid use, the death rate in the United States could be reduced significantly..."

[edit] Emergency

When an asthma attack is unresponsive to a patient's usual medication, other treatments are available to the physician or hospital:[54]

* Oxygen to alleviate the hypoxia (but not the asthma itself) that results from extreme asthma attacks.
* Nebulized salbutamol or terbutaline (short-acting beta-2-agonists), often combined with ipratropium (an anticholinergic).
* Systemic steroids, oral or intravenous (prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, or hydrocortisone). Some research has looked into an alternative inhaled route.[55]
* Other bronchodilators that are occasionally effective when the usual drugs fail:
o Intravenous salbutamol
o Nonspecific beta-agonists, injected or inhaled (epinephrine, isoetharine, isoproterenol, metaproterenol)
o Anticholinergics, IV or nebulized, with systemic effects (glycopyrrolate, atropine, ipratropium)
o Methylxanthines (theophylline, aminophylline)
o Inhalation anesthetics that have a bronchodilatory effect (isoflurane, halothane, enflurane)
o The dissociative anaesthetic ketamine, often used in endotracheal tube induction
o Magnesium sulfate, intravenous
* Intubation and mechanical ventilation, for patients in or approaching respiratory arrest.
* Heliox, a mixture of helium and oxygen, may be used in a hospital setting. It has a more laminar flow than ambient air and moves more easily through constricted airways.

[edit] Non-medical treatments

Many asthmatics, like those who suffer from other chronic disorders, use alternative treatments; surveys show that roughly 50% of asthma patients use some form of unconventional therapy.[56][57] There is little data to support the effectiveness of most of these therapies. A Cochrane systematic review of acupuncture for asthma found no evidence of efficacy.[58] A similar review of air ionisers found no evidence that they improve asthma symptoms or benefit lung function; this applied equally to positive and negative ion generators.[59] Another systematic study reviewed a range of dust mite control measures, including air filtration, chemicals to kill mites, vacuuming, mattress covers and others. Overall these methods had no effect on asthma symptoms .[60] A study of "manual therapies" for asthma, including osteopathic, chiropractic, physiotherapeutic and respiratory therapeutic manoeuvres, found there is insufficient evidence to support or refute their use in treating asthma;[61] these manoeuvers include various osteopathic and chiropractic techniques to "increase movement in the rib cage and the spine to try and improve the working of the lungs and circulation"; chest tapping, shaking, vibration, and the use of "postures to help shift and cough up phlegm." One meta-analysis finds that homeopathy may have a potentially mild benefit in reducing the intensity of symptoms.[62] However, the number of patients involved in the analysis was small, and subsequent studies have not supported this finding.[63] Several small trials have suggested some benefit from various yoga practices, ranging from integrated yoga programs,[64] yogasanas, Pranayama, meditation, and kriyas, to sahaja yoga,[65] a form of 'new religious' meditation.

[edit] Treatment controversies

In November 2007 The New York Times reported a review of more than 500 studies finding that independently backed studies on inhaled corticosteroids are up to four times more likely to find adverse effects than studies paid for by drug companies.[66][67]

[edit] Prognosis

The prognosis for asthmatics is good; especially for children with mild disease. For asthmatics diagnosed during childhood, 54% will no longer carry the diagnosis after a decade. The extent of permanent lung damage in asthmatics is unclear. Airway remodelling is observed, but it is unknown whether these represent harmful or beneficial changes.[18] Although conclusions from studies are mixed, most studies show that early treatment with glucocorticoids prevents or ameliorates decline in lung function as measured by several parameters.[68] For those who continue to suffer from mild symptoms, corticosteroids can help most to live their lives with few disabilities. The mortality rate for asthma is low, with around 6000 deaths per year in a population of some 10 million patients in the United States.[4] Better control of the condition may help prevent some of these deaths.

[edit] Epidemiology
The prevalence of childhood asthma has increased since 1980, especially in younger children.

The highest levels of asthma in the world according to the Global INitiative for Asthma (GINA) report of February 2004[69] occurred for about 30% of children in the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia, or 20% of children in Peru, New Zealand and Australia according to the method of interview, and for about 25% of adults in Great Britain, Australia and Canada. The United States also ranks highly. More than 6% of children in the United States have been diagnosed with asthma, a 75% increase in recent decades. The rate soars to 40% among some populations of urban children.[citation needed]

Current research suggests that the prevalence of childhood asthma has been increasing. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Health Interview Surveys, some 9% of US children below 18 years of age had asthma in 2001, compared with just 3.6% in 1980 (see figure). The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that some 8% of the Swiss population suffers from asthma today, compared with just 2% some 25–30 years ago.[70] Although asthma is more common in affluent countries, it is by no means a problem restricted to the affluent; the WHO estimate that there are between 15 and 20 million asthmatics in India. In the U.S., urban residents, Hispanics, and African Americans are affected more than the population as a whole. Globally, asthma is responsible for around 180,000 deaths annually.[70]

[edit] Population disparities

Asthma prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and drug response vary greatly across populations. There is an almost 30-fold difference in asthma prevalence between some of the countries included in the International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Childhood [2], with a trend toward more developed and westernized countries having higher asthma prevalence. Westernization can’t explain the entire difference in asthma prevalence between countries, however, and the disparities may also be affected by differences in genetic, social and environmental risk factors.[8] There are also worldwide disparities in asthma mortality, which is most common in low to middle income countries.[71]

Asthma prevalence in the US is higher than in most other countries in the world, but varies drastically between diverse US populations.[8] In the US, asthma prevalence is highest in Puerto Ricans, African Americans, Filipinos and Native Hawaiians, and lowest in Mexicans and Koreans.[72][73][74] Mortality rates follow similar trends, and response to albuterol is lower in Puerto Ricans than in African Americans or Mexicans.[75][76] As with worldwide asthma disparities, differences in asthma prevalence, mortality, and drug response in the US may be explained by differences in genetic, social and environmental risk factors.

Asthma prevalence also differs between populations of the same ethnicity who are born and live in different places.[77] US-born Mexican populations, for example, have higher asthma rates than non-US born Mexican populations that are living in the US.[78] This probably reflects differences in social and environmental risk factors associated with acculturation to the US.[citation needed]

Asthma prevalence and asthma deaths also differ by gender. Males are more likely to be diagnosed with asthma as children, but asthma is more likely to persist into adulthood in females. Sixty five percent more adult women than men will die from asthma. This difference may be attributable to hormonal differences, among other things. In support of this, girls who reach puberty before age 12 were found to have a later diagnosis of asthma more than twice as much as girls who reach puberty after age 12. Asthma is also the number one cause of missed days from school.

[edit] Socioeconomic factors

The incidence of asthma is highest among low-income populations (asthma deaths are most common in low to middle income countries [3]), which in the western world are disproportionately ethnic minorities[79] and are more likely to live near industrial areas. Additionally, asthma has been strongly associated with the presence of cockroaches in living quarters, which is more likely in such neighborhoods.

Asthma incidence and quality of treatment varies among different racial groups, though this may be due to correlations with income (and thus affordability of health care) and geography. For example, Black Americans are less likely to receive outpatient treatment for asthma despite having a higher prevalence of the disease. They are much more likely to have emergency room visits or hospitalization for asthma, and are three times as likely to die from an asthma attack compared to whites. The prevalence of "severe persistent" asthma is also greater in low-income communities compared with communities with better access to treatment.[80][81]

[edit] Asthma and athletics

Asthma appears to be more prevalent in athletes than in the general population. One survey of participants in the 1996 Summer Olympic Games, in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., showed that 15% had been diagnosed with asthma, and that 10% were on asthma medication.[82] These statistics have been questioned on at least two bases. Athletes with mild asthma may be more likely to be diagnosed with the condition than non-athletes, because even subtle symptoms may interfere with their performance and lead to pursuit of a diagnosis. It has also been suggested that some professional athletes who do not suffer from asthma claim to do so in order to obtain special permits to use certain performance-enhancing drugs.[citation needed]

There appears to be a relatively high incidence of asthma in sports such as cycling, mountain biking, and long-distance running, and a relatively lower incidence in weightlifting and diving. It is unclear how much of these disparities are from the effects of training in the sport, and from self-selection of sports that may appear to minimize the triggering of asthma.[82][83]

In addition, there exists a variant of asthma called exercise-induced asthma that shares many features with allergic asthma. It may occur either independently, or concurrent with the latter. Exercise studies may be helpful in diagnosing and assessing this condition.

[edit] History

Asthma was long considered a psychosomatic disease, and

... during the 1930s–50s, was even known as one of the 'holy seven' psychosomatic illnesses. At that time, psychoanalytic theories described the aetiology of asthma as psychological, with treatment often primarily involving psychoanalysis and other 'talking cures'. As the asthmatic wheeze was interpreted as the child's suppressed cry for his or her mother, psychoanalysts viewed the treatment of depression as especially important for individuals with asthma.[84]

[edit] See also
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
Asthma

* Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America
* Atopy
* Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)
* Hopkins syndrome
* Hygiene hypothesis
* Immune system
* Occupational asthma
* Reactive airway disease
* World Asthma Day
* Vocal cord dysfunction

[edit] References

1. ^ "Asthma: What Causes Asthma". Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. Retrieved on 2008-01-03.
2. ^ Zhao J, Takamura M, Yamaoka A, Odajima Y, Iikura Y (February 2002). "Altered eosinophil levels as a result of viral infection in asthma exacerbation in childhood". Pediatr Allergy Immunol 13 (1): 47–50. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3038.2002.00051.x. PMID 12000498.
3. ^ Lilly CM (2005). "Diversity of asthma: evolving concepts of pathophysiology and lessons from genetics". J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 115 (4 Suppl): S526–31. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2005.01.028. PMID 15806035.
4. ^ a b c d McFadden ER, Jr (2004). "Asthma", Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine (Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Longo DL, et al (eds)), 16th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1508–16.
5. ^ Longmore, Murray et al (2007). Oxford Handbook of Clinical Medicine, 7th ed., Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198568377.
6. ^ a b Martinez FD (2007). "Genes, environments, development and asthma: a reappraisal". Eur Respir J 29 (1): 179–84. doi:10.1183/09031936.00087906. PMID 17197483.
7. ^ Choudhry S, Seibold MA, Borrell LN "et al." (2007). "Dissecting complex diseases in complex populations: asthma in latino americans". Proc Am Thorac Soc 4 (3): 226–33. doi:10.1513/pats.200701-029AW. PMID 17607004.
8. ^ a b c d e f Gold DR,Wright R (2005). "Population disparities in asthma". Annu Rev Public Health 26: 89–113. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144528. PMID 15760282.
9. ^ "California Children's Health Study".
10. ^ a b Thavagnanam S, Fleming J, Bromley A, Shields MD, Cardwell, CR (2007). "A meta-analysis of the association between Caesarean section and childhood asthma". Clin. And Exper. Allergy online ahead of print: 629. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02780.x.
11. ^ Harju TH, Leinonen M, Nokso-Koivisto J, et al (2006). "Pathogenic bacteria and viruses in induced sputum or pharyngeal secretions of adults with stable asthma". Thorax 61 (7): 579–84. doi:10.1136/thx.2005.056291. PMID 16517571.
12. ^ Richeldi L, Ferrara G, Fabbri LM, Lasserson TJ, Gibson PG (2005). "Macrolides for chronic asthma". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4): CD002997. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002997.pub3. PMID 16235309.
13. ^ a b Marra F, Lynd L, Coombes M "et al." (2006). "Does antibiotic exposure during infancy lead to development of asthma?: a systematic review and metaanalysis". Chest 129 (3): 610–8. doi:10.1378/chest.129.3.610. PMID 16537858.
14. ^ Jeremy Laurance. "Asthma blamed on cleaning sprays and air fresheners".
15. ^ a b c Ober C,Hoffjan S (2006). "Asthma genetics 2006: the long and winding road to gene discovery". Genes Immun 7 (2): 95–100. doi:10.1038/sj.gene.6364284. PMID 16395390.
16. ^ Bouzigon E, Corda E, Aschard H, et al (October 2008). "Effect of 17q21 Variants and Smoking Exposure in Early-Onset Asthma". The New England journal of medicine. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0806604. PMID 18923164.
17. ^ a b Martinez FD (2007). "CD14, endotoxin, and asthma risk: actions and interactions". Proc Am Thorac Soc 4 (3): 221–5. doi:10.1513/pats.200702-035AW. PMID 17607003.
18. ^ a b Maddox L, Schwartz DA (2002). "The pathophysiology of asthma". Annu. Rev. Med. 53: 477–98. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.103921. PMID 11818486.
19. ^ "Lecture 14: Hypersensitivity". Retrieved on 2008-09-18.
20. ^ "Allergy & Asthma Disease Management Center: Ask the Expert". Retrieved on 2008-09-18.
21. ^ Jenkins C, Costello J, Hodge L (2004). "Systematic review of prevalence of aspirin induced asthma and its implications for clinical practice". BMJ 328 (7437): 434. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7437.434. PMID 14976098.
22. ^ Nemery B, Hoet PH, Nowak D (2002). "Indoor swimming pools, water chlorination and respiratory health". Eur. Respir. J. 19 (5): 790–3. doi:10.1183/09031936.02.00308602. PMID 12030714.
23. ^ about.com article
24. ^ Asthma and Altitude
25. ^ Szentivanyi, Andor (1968). The Beta Adrenergic Theory of the Atopic Abnormality in Asthma.
26. ^ Lockey, Richard, In lasting tribute: Andor Szentivanyi, MD. J. Allergy and Clinical Immunology, January, 2006
27. ^ Szentivanyi A., Ali K., Calderon EG., Brooks SM., Coffey RG., Lockey RF. (1993). "The in vitro effect of Imunnoglobulin E {IgE} on cyclic AMP concentrations in A549 human pulmonary epithelial cells with or without beta adrenergic stimulation". J. Allergy Clin Immunol. 91: 379. - Part of Abstracts from:
"50th Anniversary of the American Academy of Allergy and Immunology. 49th Annual Meeting. Chicago, Illinois, March 12-17, 1993. Abstracts". J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 91 (1 Pt 2): 141–379. 1993. PMID 8421135.
28. ^ (2001) in Kowalak JP, Hughes AS et al (eds): Professional Guide To Diseases, 7th ed., Springhouse.
29. ^ Lockey, Richard F. (2006-04-28). "Anaphylaxis: Synopsis". Allergic Diseases Resource Center. World Allergy Organization. Retrieved on September 23, 2006.[dead link]
30. ^ Ouellette JJ, Reed CE (1967). "The effect of partial beta adrenergic blockade on the bronchial response of hay fever subjects to ragweed aerosol". J Allergy 39 (3): 160–6. doi:10.1016/0021-8707(67)90033-0. PMID 5227155.
31. ^ Fraser CM, Venter JC (1980). "The synthesis of beta-adrenergic receptors in cultured human lung cells: induction by glucocorticoids". Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 94 (1): 390–7. doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(80)80233-6. PMID 6248064.
32. ^ Cromie, William J. (2006-03-16). "Researchers uncover cause of asthma", Harvard University Gazette, Harvard News Office. Retrieved on 23 September 2006.
33. ^ University of Michigan Health System (May 25, 2005). "Breathing disorders during sleep are common among asthmatics, may help predict severe asthma". Press release. Retrieved on 2006-09-23.
34. ^ Basner, Robert C. (2006-07-25). "Asthma and OSA". ASAA Resources > Publications. American Sleep Apnea Association. Retrieved on September 23, 2006.
35. ^ Leggett JJ, Johnston BT, Mills M, Gamble J, Heaney LG (2005). "Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in difficult asthma: relationship to asthma outcome". Chest 127 (4): 1227–31. doi:10.1378/chest.127.4.1227. PMID 15821199, http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/full/127/4/1227.
36. ^ Pinnock H, Shah R (2007). "Asthma". BMJ 334 (7598): 847–50. doi:10.1136/bmj.39140.634896.BE. PMID 17446617.
37. ^ "Peak flow charting software".
38. ^ "'Be in control' pack" (PDF). Asthma UK. Retrieved on 2007-11-19.
39. ^ Corbo J, Bijur P, Lahn M, Gallagher EJ (2005). "Concordance between capnography and arterial blood gas measurements of carbon dioxide in acute asthma". Annals of emergency medicine 46 (4): 323–7. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.005. PMID 16187465.
40. ^ Vargas PA, Simpson PM, Gary Wheeler J, et al (2004). "Characteristics of children with asthma who are enrolled in a Head Start program". J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 114 (3): 499–504. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.05.025. PMID 15356547.
41. ^ Thomson NC, Spears M (2005). "The influence of smoking on the treatment response in patients with asthma". Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 5 (1): 57–63. PMID 15643345.
42. ^ EWG || Auto Asthma Index
43. ^ Eisner MD, Yelin EH, Katz PP, Earnest G, Blanc PD (2002). "Exposure to indoor combustion and adult asthma outcomes: environmental tobacco smoke, gas stoves, and woodsmoke". Thorax 57 (11): 973–8. doi:10.1136/thorax.57.11.973. PMID 12403881.
44. ^ a b National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. National Institutes of Health pub no 97–4051. Bethesda, MD, 1997. (PDF)
45. ^ Asthma and Air Filters Asthma and Air Filters[dead link]
46. ^ Abramson MJ, Puy RM, Weiner JM (1995). "Is allergen immunotherapy effective in asthma? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials". Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 151 (4): 969–74. PMID 7697274.
47. ^ "British Guideline on the Management of Asthma" (PDF). Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2008). Retrieved on 2008-08-04.
48. ^ a b Hendeles L, Marshik PL, Ahrens R, Kifle Y, Shuster J (2005). "Response to nonprescription epinephrine inhaler during nocturnal asthma". Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 95 (6): 530–4. PMID 16400891.
49. ^ Rodrigo GJ, Nannini LJ (2006). "Comparison between nebulized adrenaline and beta2 agonists for the treatment of acute asthma. A meta-analysis of randomized trials". Am J Emerg Med 24 (2): 217–22. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2005.10.008. PMID 16490653.
50. ^ Papi A, Canonica GW, Maestrelli P, et al (2007). "Rescue use of beclomethasone and albuterol in a single inhaler for mild asthma". N. Engl. J. Med. 356 (20): 2040–52. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa063861. PMID 17507703.
51. ^ "Serevent Diskus, Advair Diskus, and Foradil Information (Long Acting Beta Agonists) - Drug information". FDA (2006-03-03).
52. ^ Salpeter S, Buckley N, Ormiston T, Salpeter E (2006). "Meta-analysis: effect of long-acting beta-agonists on severe asthma exacerbations and asthma-related deaths". Ann Intern Med 144 (12): 904–12. PMID 16754916.
53. ^ Ramanujan, Krishna (2006-06-09). "Common asthma inhalers cause up to 80 percent of asthma-related deaths, Cornell and Stanford researchers assert". Cornell Chronicle Online. Cornell News Service. Retrieved on 2006-09-23.
54. ^ Rodrigo GJ, Rodrigo C, Hall JB (2004). "Acute asthma in adults: a review". Chest 125 (3): 1081–102. doi:10.1378/chest.125.3.1081. PMID 15006973.
55. ^ Rodrigo G (2005). "Comparison of inhaled fluticasone with intravenous hydrocortisone in the treatment of adult acute asthma". Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171 (11): 1231–6. doi:10.1164/rccm.200410-1415OC. PMID 15764724.
56. ^ Blanc PD, Trupin L, Earnest G, Katz PP, Yelin EH, Eisner MD (2001). "Alternative therapies among adults with a reported diagnosis of asthma or rhinosinusitis : data from a population-based survey". Chest 120 (5): 1461–7. doi:10.1378/chest.120.5.1461. PMID 11713120.
57. ^ Shenfield G, Lim E, Allen H (2002). "Survey of the use of complementary medicines and therapies in children with asthma". J Paediatr Child Health 38 (3): 252–7. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00770.x. PMID 12047692.
58. ^ McCarney RW, Brinkhaus B, Lasserson TJ, Linde K (2004). "Acupuncture for chronic asthma". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1): CD000008. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000008.pub2. PMID 14973944.
59. ^ Blackhall K, Appleton S, Cates CJ (2003). "Ionisers for chronic asthma". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3): CD002986. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002986. PMID 12917939.
60. ^ PC Gøtzsche, HK Johansen (2008). "House dust mite control measures for asthma". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD001187. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001187.pub3.
61. ^ Hondras MA, Linde K, Jones AP (2005). "Manual therapy for asthma". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD001002. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001002.pub2. PMID 15846609.
62. ^ Reilly D, Taylor MA, Beattie NG, et al (1994). "Is evidence for homoeopathy reproducible?". Lancet 344 (8937): 1601–6. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90407-3. PMID 7983994.
63. ^ White A, Slade P, Hunt C, Hart A, Ernst E (2003). "Individualised homeopathy as an adjunct in the treatment of childhood asthma: a randomised placebo controlled trial". Thorax 58 (4): 317–21. doi:10.1136/thorax.58.4.317. PMID 12668794.
64. ^ Nagendra HR, Nagarathna R (1986). "An integrated approach of yoga therapy for bronchial asthma: a 3-54-month prospective study". J Asthma 23 (3): 123–37. doi:10.3109/02770908609077486. PMID 3745111.
65. ^ Manocha R, Marks GB, Kenchington P, Peters D, Salome CM (2002). "Sahaja yoga in the management of moderate to severe asthma: a randomised controlled trial". Thorax 57 (2): 110–5. doi:10.1136/thorax.57.2.110. PMID 11828038.
66. ^ Nagourney E (2007-11-13). "For the Record: In Tests of Inhalers, Results May Depend on Who Pays", The New York Times. Retrieved on 2 December 2007.
67. ^ Nieto A, Mazon A, Pamies R, et al (2007). "Adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids in funded and nonfunded studies". Arch. Intern. Med. 167 (19): 2047–53. doi:10.1001/archinte.167.19.2047. PMID 17954797.
68. ^ Beckett PA, Howarth PH (2003). "Pharmacotherapy and airway remodelling in asthma?". Thorax 58 (2): 163–74. doi:10.1136/thorax.58.2.163. PMID 12554904.
69. ^ Masoli, Matthew; Denise Fabian, Shaun Holt, Richard Beasley (2004). "Global Burden of Asthma(TM)" (PDF). Retrieved on 2008-08-08.
70. ^ a b World Health Organization. "Bronchial asthma: scope of the problem". Retrieved on 2005-08-23.
71. ^ World Health Organization. "WHO: Asthma". Retrieved on 2007-12-29.
72. ^ Lara M, Akinbami L, Flores G,Morgenstern H (2006). "Heterogeneity of childhood asthma among Hispanic children: Puerto Rican children bear a disproportionate burden". Pediatrics 117 (1): 43–53. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1714. PMID 16396859.
73. ^ Davis AM, Kreutzer R, Lipsett M, King G,Shaikh N (2006). "Asthma prevalence in Hispanic and Asian American ethnic subgroups: results from the California Healthy Kids Survey". Pediatrics 118 (2): e363–70. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2687. PMID 16882779.
74. ^ Johnson DB, Oyama N, LeMarchand L,Wilkens L (2004). "Native Hawaiians mortality, morbidity, and lifestyle: comparing data from 1982, 1990, and 2000". Pac Health Dialog 11 (2): 120–30. PMID 16281689.
75. ^ Naqvi M, Thyne S, Choudhry S "et al." (2007). "Ethnic-specific differences in bronchodilator responsiveness among african americans, puerto ricans, and mexicans with asthma". J Asthma 44 (8): 639–48. doi:10.1080/02770900701554441. PMID 17943575.
76. ^ Burchard EG, Avila PC, Nazario S "et al." (2004). "Lower bronchodilator responsiveness in Puerto Rican than in Mexican subjects with asthma". Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169 (3): 386–92. doi:10.1164/rccm.200309-1293OC. PMID 14617512.
77. ^ Gold DR,Acevedo-Garcia D (2005). "Immigration to the United States and acculturation as risk factors for asthma and allergy". J Allergy Clin Immunol 116 (1): 38–41. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2005.04.033. PMID 15990770.
78. ^ Eldeirawi KM,Persky VW (2006). "Associations of acculturation and country of birth with asthma and wheezing in Mexican American youths". J Asthma 43 (4): 279–86. doi:10.1080/0277090060022869. PMID 16809241.
79. ^ "Patient/Public Education: Fast Facts - Asthma Demographics/Statistics". American Academy of Allergy Asthma & Immunology. Retrieved on 2006-05-02.
80. ^ National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (May 2004). Morbidity & Mortality: 2004 Chart Book On Cardiovascular, Lung, and Blood Diseases, National Institutes of Health.
81. ^ National Center for Health Statistics (7 April 2006). "Asthma Prevalence, Health Care Use and Mortality, 2002". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
82. ^ a b Weiler JM, Layton T, Hunt M (1998). "Asthma in United States Olympic athletes who participated in the 1996 Summer Games". J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 102 (5): 722–6. doi:10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70010-7. PMID 9819287.
83. ^ Helenius I, Haahtela T (2000). "Allergy and asthma in elite summer sport athletes". J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 106 (3): 444–52. doi:10.1067/mai.2000.107749. PMID 10984362.
84. ^ Opolski M, Wilson I (September 2005). "Asthma and depression: a pragmatic review of the literature and recommendations for future research". Clin Pract Epidemol Ment Health 1: 18. doi:10.1186/1745-0179-1-18. PMID 16185365.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asthma